PFKFB3 regulates breast cancer tumorigenesis and Fulvestrant sensitivity by affecting ERα stability.

Estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) is expressed in approximately 70% of breast cancer cases and determines the sensitivity and effectiveness of endocrine therapy. 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2, 6-biphosphatase3 (PFKFB3) is a glycolytic enzyme that is highly expressed in a great many human tumors, and recent studies have shown that it plays a significant role in improving drug sensitivity. However, the role of PFKFB3 in regulating ERα expression and the underlying mechanism remains unclear. Here, we find by using immunohistochemistry (IHC) that PFKFB3 is elevated in ER-positive breast cancer and high expression of PFKFB3 resulted in a worse prognosis. In vitro and in vivo experiments verify that PFKFB3 promotes ER-positive breast cancer cell proliferation. The overexpression of PFKFB3 promotes the estrogen-independent ER-positive breast cancer growth. In an estrogen-free condition, RNA-sequencing data from MCF7 cells treated with siPFKFB3 showed enrichment of the estrogen signaling pathway, and a luciferase assay demonstrated that knockdown of PFKFB3 inhibited the ERα transcriptional activity. Mechanistically, down-regulation of PFKFB3 promotes STUB1 binding to ERα, which accelerates ERα degradation by K48-based ubiquitin linkage. Finally, growth of ER-positive breast cancer cells in vivo was more potently inhibited by fulvestrant combined with the PFKFB3 inhibitor PFK158 than for each drug alone. In conclusion, these data suggest that PFKFB3 is identified as an adverse prognosis factor for ER-positive breast cancer and plays a previously unrecognized role in the regulation of ERα stability and activity. Our results further explores an effective approach to improve fulvestrant sensitivity through the early combination with a PFKFB3 inhibitor.

Chemotherapy combined with endocrine neoadjuvant therapy for hormone receptor-positive local advanced breast cancer: a case report and literature review.

Background: Early studies have revealed antagonistic effects associated with stacking chemotherapy (CT) and endocrine therapy (ET), thereby conventional wisdom does not advocate the simultaneous combination of these two treatment modalities. Limited clinical studies exist on the combined use of neoadjuvant CT (NACT) and neoadjuvant ET (NET), and there are no reported instances of concurrent neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) using capecitabine and fulvestrant (FUL). Case presentation: We reported a 54-year-old woman who was diagnosed with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) LABC at our hospital. After neoadjuvant treatment involving two distinct CT regimens did not lead to tumor regression. Consequently, the patient was transitioned to concurrent capecitabine and FUL therapy. This change resulted in favorable pathological remission without any significant adverse events during treatment. Conclusions: A novel approach involving concurrent neoadjuvant therapy with CT and endocrine therapy may offer a potentially effective treatment avenue for some cases with HR+ LABC.

Endocrine and Targeted Therapy for Hormone Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer-Capivasertib-Fulvestrant: ASCO Rapid Recommendation Update.

ASCO Rapid Recommendation Updates highlight revisions to select ASCO guideline recommendations as a response to the emergence of new and practice-changing data. The rapid updates are supported by an evidence review and follow the guideline development processes outlined in the ASCO Guideline Methodology Manual. The goal of these articles is to disseminate updated recommendations, in a timely manner, to better inform health practitioners and the public on the best available cancer care options. Guidelines and updates are not intended to substitute for independent professional judgment of the treating provider and do not account for individual variation among patients. See appendix for disclaimers and other important information (Appendix 1 and Appendix 2, online only).

Application of fluorocarbon nanoparticles of 131I-fulvestrant as a targeted radiation drug for endocrine therapy on human breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is the most prevalent malignant tumor among women, with hormone receptor-positive cases constituting 70%. Fulvestrant, an antagonist for these receptors, is utilized for advanced metastatic hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Yet, its inhibitory effect on tumor cells is not strong, and it lacks direct cytotoxicity. Consequently, there's a significant challenge in preventing recurrence and metastasis once cancer cells develop resistance to fulvestrant. METHOD: To address these challenges, we engineered tumor-targeting nanoparticles termed 131I-fulvestrant-ALA-PFP-FA-NPs. This involved labeling fulvestrant with 131I to create 131I-fulvestrant. Subsequently, we incorporated the 131I-fulvestrant and 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) into fluorocarbon nanoparticles with folate as the targeting agent. This design facilitates a tri-modal therapeutic approach-endocrine therapy, radiotherapy, and PDT for estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. RESULTS: Our in vivo and in vitro tests showed that the drug-laden nanoparticles effectively zeroed in on tumors. This targeting efficiency was corroborated using SPECT-CT imaging, confocal microscopy, and small animal fluorescence imaging. The 131I-fulvestrant-ALA-PFP-FA-NPs maintained stability and showcased potent antitumor capabilities due to the synergism of endocrine therapy, radiotherapy, and CR-PDT. Throughout the treatment duration, we detected no notable irregularities in hematological, biochemical, or histological evaluations. CONCLUSION: We've pioneered a nanoparticle system loaded with radioactive isotope 131I, endocrine therapeutic agents, and a photosensitizer precursor. This system offers a combined modality of radiotherapy, endocrine treatment, and PDT for breast cancer.

A risk analysis of alpelisib-induced hyperglycemia in patients with advanced solid tumors and breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Hyperglycemia is an on-target effect of PI3Kα inhibitors. Early identification and intervention of treatment-induced hyperglycemia is important for improving management of patients receiving a PI3Kα inhibitor like alpelisib. Here, we characterize incidence of grade 3/4 alpelisib-related hyperglycemia, along with time to event, management, and outcomes using a machine learning model. METHODS: Data for the risk model were pooled from patients receiving alpelisib ± fulvestrant in the open-label, phase 1 X2101 trial and the randomized, double-blind, phase 3 SOLAR-1 trial. The pooled population (n = 505) included patients with advanced solid tumors (X2101, n = 221) or HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer (SOLAR-1, n = 284). External validation was performed using BYLieve trial patient data (n = 340). Hyperglycemia incidence and management were analyzed for SOLAR-1. RESULTS: A random forest model identified 5 baseline characteristics most associated with risk of developing grade 3/4 hyperglycemia (fasting plasma glucose, body mass index, HbA1c, monocytes, age). This model was used to derive a score to classify patients as high or low risk for developing grade 3/4 hyperglycemia. Applying the model to patients treated with alpelisib and fulvestrant in SOLAR-1 showed higher incidence of hyperglycemia (all grade and grade 3/4), increased use of antihyperglycemic medications, and more discontinuations due to hyperglycemia (16.7% vs. 2.6% of discontinuations) in the high- versus low-risk group. Among patients in SOLAR-1 (alpelisib + fulvestrant arm) with PIK3CA mutations, median progression-free survival was similar between the high- and low-risk groups (11.0 vs. 10.9 months). For external validation, the model was applied to the BYLieve trial, for which successful classification into high- and low-risk groups with shorter time to grade 3/4 hyperglycemia in the high-risk group was observed. CONCLUSIONS: A risk model using 5 clinically relevant baseline characteristics was able to identify patients at higher or lower probability for developing alpelisib-induced hyperglycemia. Early identification of patients who may be at higher risk for hyperglycemia may improve management (including monitoring and early intervention) and potentially lead to improved outcomes. REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01219699 (registration date: October 13, 2010; retrospectively registered), ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02437318 (registration date: May 7, 2015); ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03056755 (registration date: February 17, 2017).

Capivasertib: First Approval.

Capivasertib (Truqap™) is an orally available, small-molecule pan-AKT inhibitor being developed by AstraZeneca for the treatment of various cancers, including breast and prostate cancers. Capivasertib received its first approval, in the USA, in November 2023 for use in combination with fulvestrant for the treatment of adult patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2)-negative, locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer with one or more PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN-alterations following progression on at least one endocrine-based regimen in the metastatic setting or recurrence on or within 12 months of completing adjuvant therapy. Capivasertib is also under regulatory review for HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer in the EU and several other countries, and in phase III clinical development for use (in combination with other anti-cancer agents) in the treatment of triple-negative breast cancer, castration-resistant prostate cancer, and hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of capivasertib leading to this first approval for HR-positive, HER2-negative, locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer.

Fulvestrant and everolimus efficacy after CDK4/6 inhibitor: a prospective study with circulating tumor DNA analysis.

In a prospective study (NCT02866149), we assessed the efficacy of fulvestrant and everolimus in CDK4/6i pre-treated mBC patients and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) changes throughout therapy. Patients treated with fulvestrant and everolimus had their ctDNA assessed at baseline, after 3-5 weeks and at disease progression. Somatic mutations were identified in archived tumor tissues by targeted NGS and tracked in cell-free DNA by droplet digital PCR. ctDNA detection was then associated with clinicopathological characteristics and patients' progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and best overall response (BOR). In the 57 included patients, median PFS and OS were 6.8 (95%CI [5.03-11.5]) and 38.2 (95%CI [30.0-not reached]) months, respectively. In 47 response-evaluable patients, BOR was a partial response or stable disease in 15 (31.9%) and 11 (23.4%) patients, respectively. Among patients with trackable somatic mutation and available plasma sample, N = 33/47 (70.2%) and N = 19/36 (52.8%) had ctDNA detected at baseline and at 3 weeks, respectively. ctDNA detection at baseline and PIK3CA mutation had an adverse prognostic impact on PFS and OS in multivariate analysis. This prospective cohort study documents the efficacy of fulvestrant and everolimus in CDK4/6i-pretreated ER + /HER2- mBC and highlights the clinical validity of early ctDNA changes as pharmacodynamic biomarker.

Pharmacological insights on novel oral selective estrogen receptor degraders in breast cancer.

The therapeutic landscape of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer includes endocrine treatments with aromatase inhibitors (AIs), selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), and selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERDs). Fulvestrant is the first approved SERD with proven efficacy and good tolerability in clinical practice. However, drug resistance, low receptor affinity, and parental administration stimulated the search for new oral SERDs opening a new therapeutic era in ER + breast cancer. Elacestrant is an orally bioavailable SERD that has been recently approved by the FDA for postmenopausal women with ER+, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-), estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1)-mutated advanced or metastatic breast cancer with disease progression following at least one line of endocrine therapy. Other molecules of the same class currently tested in clinical trials are amcenestrant, giredestrant, camizestrant, and imlunestrant. The current review article offers a detailed pharmacological perspective of this emerging drug class, which may help with their possible future clinical applications.

Simultaneous quantification of four hormone therapy drugs by LC-MS/MS: Clinical applications in breast cancer patients.

INTRODUCTION: Aromatase inhibitors such as anastrozole, letrozole, exemestane and selective estrogen down-regulator (SERD) fulvestrant are used mostly to treat breast cancer estrogen receptor positive in post-menopausal women. These drugs are given either through the oral route or by intramuscular injection. They have shown great inter-individual variability with a risk of cardiometabolic disorders. Hence the importance of their therapeutic drug monitoring not only for exposure-efficacy but also exposure-toxicity. We describe here a LC-MS/MS method for the simultaneous quantification of anastrozole, letrozole, exemestane and fulvestrant in human plasma. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Plasma samples were prepared by a single-step protein precipitation. The liquid chromatography system was paired with a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer. Quantification were achieved in Multiple Reactions Monitoring mode and the electrospray ionization was in positive mode. RESULTS: The method demonstrated consistent analytical performance across various parameters, including linearity, specificity, sensitivity, matrix effect, upper and lower limits of quantification, extraction recovery, precision, accuracy, hemolysis effect, dilution integrity, and stability under different storage conditions, in accordance with established guidelines. The analysis time for each run was 4 min. Calibration curves exhibited linearity within the 1-100 ng/mL range, with correlation coefficients > 0.99 for the four analytes. Plasma concentrations from 42 patients were integrated into the selected calibration. Stability assessments indicated that the four drugs remained stable at - 20 °C for three months, 15 days under refrigeration, up to 7 days at room temperature, and after three freeze-thaw cycles. CONCLUSION: We have developed and validated this quantitative method for therapeutic drug monitoring of those four hormone therapy drugs:anastrozole, letrozole, fulvestrant and exemestane. This method can be also used for future clinical pharmacokinetics /pharmacodynamics studies.

Identifying prognostic biomarkers for palbociclib add-on therapy in fulvestrant-resistant breast cancer using cell-free DNA sequencing.

BACKGROUND: The FUTURE trial (UMIN000029294) demonstrated the safety and efficacy of adding palbociclib after fulvestrant resistance in patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) advanced and metastatic breast cancer (ABC/MBC). In this planned sub-study, cancer panel sequencing of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) was utilized to explore prognostic and predictive biomarkers for further palbociclib treatment following fulvestrant resistance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Herein, 149 cfDNA samples from 65 patients with fulvestrant-resistant disease were analysed at the time of palbociclib addition after fulvestrant resistance (baseline), on day 15 of cycle 1, and at the end of treatment using the assay for identifying diverse mutations in 34 cancer-related genes. RESULTS: During the course of treatment, mutations in ESR1, PIK3CA, FOXA1, RUNX1, TBX3, and TP53 were the most common genomic alterations observed. Analysis of genomic mutations revealed that before fulvestrant introduction, baseline PIK3CA mutations were marginally lower in metastatic aromatase inhibitor (AI)-treated patients compared to adjuvant AI-treated patients (P = 0.063). Baseline PIK3CA mutations were associated with poorer progression-free survival [hazard ratio: 1.62, P = 0.04]. Comparative analysis between baseline and early-changing gene mutations identified poor prognostic factors including early-changing MAP3K1 mutations (hazard ratio: 4.66, P = 0.04), baseline AR mutations (hazard ratio: 3.53, P = 0.04), and baseline PIK3CA mutations (hazard ratio: 3.41, P = 0.02). Notably, the relationship between ESR1 mutations and mutations in PIK3CA, MAP3K1, and TP53 weakened as treatment progressed. Instead, PIK3CA mutations became correlated with TP53 and FOXA1 mutations. CONCLUSIONS: Cancer panel testing for cfDNA identified prognostic and predictive biomarkers for palbociclib add-on therapy after acquiring fulvestrant resistance in patients with HR+/HER2- ABC/MBC.

Treatment patterns of patients with HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer receiving CDK4/6 inhibitor-based regimens: a cohort study in the French nationwide healthcare database.

PURPOSE: To assess real-world treatment patterns in patients diagnosed with hormone receptor positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (mBC) who received cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors in combination with an aromatase inhibitor (AI) or fulvestrant at first line. METHODS: Patient characteristics, treatment history, and outcomes data were extracted from the French 'Système National des Données de Santé' (SNDS) database for patients diagnosed with HR+/HER2- mBC between January 2014 and June 2019 and who received combination therapy with a CDK4/6 inhibitor and endocrine therapy. Kaplan-Meier methodology was used to assess time to next treatment (TTNT) and time to treatment discontinuation (TTTD). RESULTS: The cohort comprised 6061 patients including 4032 patients who received CDK4/6 inhibitors + AIs and 2029 patients who received CDK4/6 inhibitors + fulvestrant. Median follow-up was 13.5 months (IQR 9.5-18.1). The median TTTD of first line treatment with CDK4/6 inhibitors + AIs and CDK4/6 inhibitors + fulvestrant was 17.3 months (95% CI 16.8-17.9) and 9.7 months (95% CI 9.0-10.2), respectively. Chemotherapy was the most common second line therapy. Median TTTD of subsequent treatment lines was progressively shorter following first line treatment with CDK4/6 inhibitors + AIs (2nd line: 4.6 months (95% CI 4.4-4.9) and with CDK4/6 inhibitors + fulvestrant (2nd line: 4.7 months (95% CI 4.3-5.1). TTNT was longer than TTTD across lines of therapy. CONCLUSION: This real-world analysis confirms the effectiveness of CDK4/6 inhibitor-based regimens in French patients and highlights the frequent use of chemotherapy as second line therapy.

Endocrine-Sensitive Disease Rate in Postmenopausal Patients With Estrogen Receptor-Rich/ERBB2-Negative Breast Cancer Receiving Neoadjuvant Anastrozole, Fulvestrant, or Their Combination: A Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Adding fulvestrant to anastrozole (A+F) improved survival in postmenopausal women with advanced estrogen receptor (ER)-positive/ERBB2 (formerly HER2)-negative breast cancer. However, the combination has not been tested in early-stage disease. Objective: To determine whether neoadjuvant fulvestrant or A+F increases the rate of pathologic complete response or ypT1-2N0/N1mic/Ki67 2.7% or less residual disease (referred to as endocrine-sensitive disease) over anastrozole alone. Design, Setting, and Participants: A phase 3 randomized clinical trial assessing differences in clinical and correlative outcomes between each of the fulvestrant-containing arms and the anastrozole arm. Postmenopausal women with clinical stage II to III, ER-rich (Allred score 6-8 or >66%)/ERBB2-negative breast cancer were included. All analyses were based on data frozen on March 2, 2023. Interventions: Patients received anastrozole, fulvestrant, or a combination for 6 months preoperatively. Tumor Ki67 was assessed at week 4 and optionally at week 12, and if greater than 10% at either time point, the patient switched to neoadjuvant chemotherapy or immediate surgery. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the endocrine-sensitive disease rate (ESDR). A secondary outcome was the percentage change in Ki67 after 4 weeks of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) (week 4 Ki67 suppression). Results: Between February 2014 and November 2018, 1362 female patients (mean [SD] age, 65.0 [8.2] years) were enrolled. Among the 1298 evaluable patients, ESDRs were 18.7% (95% CI, 15.1%-22.7%), 22.8% (95% CI, 18.9%-27.1%), and 20.5% (95% CI, 16.8%-24.6%) with anastrozole, fulvestrant, and A+F, respectively. Compared to anastrozole, neither fulvestrant-containing regimen significantly improved ESDR or week 4 Ki67 suppression. The rate of week 4 or week 12 Ki67 greater than 10% was 25.1%, 24.2%, and 15.7% with anastrozole, fulvestrant, and A+F, respectively. Pathologic complete response/residual cancer burden class I occurred in 8 of 167 patients and 17 of 167 patients, respectively (15.0%; 95% CI, 9.9%-21.3%), after switching to neoadjuvant chemotherapy due to week 4 or week 12 Ki67 greater than 10%. PAM50 subtyping derived from RNA sequencing of baseline biopsies available for 753 patients (58%) identified 394 luminal A, 304 luminal B, and 55 nonluminal tumors. A+F led to a greater week 4 Ki67 suppression than anastrozole alone in luminal B tumors (median [IQR], -90.4% [-95.2 to -81.9%] vs -76.7% [-89.0 to -55.6%]; P < .001), but not luminal A tumors. Thirty-six nonluminal tumors (65.5%) had a week 4 or week 12 Ki67 greater than 10%. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, neither fulvestrant nor A+F significantly improved the 6-month ESDR over anastrozole in ER-rich/ERBB2-negative breast cancer. Aromatase inhibition remains the standard-of-care NET. Differential NET response by PAM50 subtype in exploratory analyses warrants further investigation. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01953588.

Anticancer effect of zoledronic acid in endocrine-resistant breast cancer cells via HER-2 signaling.

HER-2 overexpression is a major mechanism involved in endocrine-resistant breast cancer, which has very limited treatment options. Zoledronic acid (ZA) is a drug in the bisphosphonate group used to treat osteoporosis. ZA was reported to exhibit activity in various cancers, with higher efficacy associated with estrogen-deprivation states. ZA inhibits cell proliferation in lung cancer through the epidermal growth factor receptor signaling pathway. Because endocrine-resistant breast cancer cells overexpress HER-2 and grow independently without estrogen, ZA may exert anticancer effects in these cell types. The inhibitory effects and mechanisms of ZA in endocrine-resistant cells through HER-2 signaling were investigated. The efficacy of ZA was higher in the endocrine-resistant breast cancer cells when compared with the wild-type cells. ZA also exhibited a synergistic effect with fulvestrant and may circumvent fulvestrant resistance. ZA decreased phosphorylated ERK (pERK) levels in resistant cell lines and attenuated HER-2 signaling in tamoxifen- and fulvestrant-resistant cells. ZA significantly decreased HER-2 levels and its downstream signaling molecules, including pAKT and pNF-κB in fulvestrant-resistant breast cancer cells. This inhibitory effect may explain the lower IC50 values of ZA in fulvestrant-resistant cells compared with tamoxifen-resistant cells. Moreover, ZA inhibited the migration and invasion in the resistant cell lines, suggesting an ability to inhibit tumor metastasis. The results indicate that ZA has potential for repurposing as an adjuvant treatment for patients with endocrine-resistant breast cancer.

The value of oral selective estrogen receptor degraders in patients with HR-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer after progression on ≥ 1 line of endocrine therapy: systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Currently, the value of oral selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERDs) for hormone receptor-positive (HR+) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer (aBC) after progression on ≥ 1 line of endocrine therapy (ET) remains controversial. We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate progression-free survival (PFS) and safety benefits in several clinical trials. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, and conference proceedings (SABCS, ASCO, ESMO, and ESMO Breast) were searched systematically and comprehensively. Random effects models or fixed effects models were used to assess pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for treatment with oral SERDs versus standard of care. RESULTS: A total of four studies involving 1,290 patients were included in our analysis. The hazard ratio (HR) of PFS showed that the oral SERD regimen was better than standard of care in patients with HR+/HER2- aBC after progression on ≥ 1 line of ET (HR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.62-0.91, p = 0.004). In patients with ESR1 mutations, the oral SERD regimen provided better PFS than standard of care (HR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.47-0.71, p < 0.00001). Regarding patients with disease progression following previous use of CDK4/6 inhibitors, PFS benefit was observed in oral SERD-treatment arms compared to standard of care (HR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.64-0.87, p = 0.0002). CONCLUSIONS: The oral SERD regimen provides a significant PFS benefit compared to standard-of-care ET in patients with HR+/HER2- aBC after progression on ≥ 1 line of ET. In particular, we recommend oral SERDs as a preferred choice for those patients with ESR1m, and it could be a potential replacement for fulvestrant. The oral SERD regimen is also beneficial after progression on CDK4/6 inhibitors combined with endocrine therapy.

Complete elimination of estrogen receptor α by PROTAC estrogen receptor α degrader ERD-148 in breast cancer cells.

PURPOSE: Estrogen Receptor α (ERα) is a well-established therapeutic target for Estrogen Receptor (ER)-positive breast cancers. Both Selective Estrogen Receptor Degraders (SERD) and PROTAC ER degraders are synthetic compounds suppressing the ER activity through the degradation of ER. However, the differences between SERD and PROTAC ER degraders are far from clear. METHODS: The effect of PROTAC ER degrader ERD-148 and SERD fulvestrant on protein degradation was evaluated by western blot analysis. The cell proliferation was tested by WST-8 assays and the gene expressions were assessed by gene microarray and real-time RT-PCR analysis after the compound treatment. RESULTS: ERD-148 is a potent and selective PROTAC ERα degrader. It degrades not only unphosphorylated ERα but also the phosphorylated ERα in the cells. In contrast, the SERD fulvestrant showed much-reduced degradation potency on the phosphorylated ERα. The more complete degradation of ERα by ERD-148 translates into a greater maximum cell growth inhibition. However, ERD-148 and fulvestrant share a similar gene regulation profile except for the variation of regulation potency. Further studies indicate that ERD-148 degrades the ERα in fulvestrant-resistant cells. CONCLUSION: PROTAC ER degrader has a different mechanism of action compared to SERD which may be used in treating fulvestrant-resistant cancers.

Successful continuance of CDK4/6 inhibitor treatment with palbociclib after abemaciclib-induced hepatotoxicity in breast cancer: a case report.

Abemaciclib, a cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitor, causes severe hepatotoxicity, a severe adverse event associated with the loss of treatment opportunities. We report a case of liver injury (grade 4) during treatment with abemaciclib, in which the patient was switched to palbociclib and successfully treated with this CDK4/6 inhibitor. A 73-year-old woman with bone metastatic breast cancer (hormone-positive, HER2-negative) was treated with abemaciclib, fulvestrant, denosumab, and precipitated calcium carbonate with cholecalciferol and magnesium carbonate (pCCCM). On day 17, the patient developed skin rashes on her trunk and arms. On day 22, abemaciclib and pCCCM were discontinued due to drug eruption. Grade 3 aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and grade 4 alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels increased on day 29. Therefore, fulvestrant and denosumab were suspended as the causes of severe hepatotoxicity, in addition to the two drugs suspected of causing the skin eruption. On day 43, AST and ALT levels did not improve, and the patient was referred to a hepatologist. The hepatologist diagnosed hepatotoxicity as a drug-induced liver injury through additional tests and interviews. Fulvestrant treatment was resumed on day 78, and palbociclib on day 92, and denosumab and pCCCM on day 134. On day 287, treatment with the CDK4/6 inhibitor was continued without evidence of liver dysfunction. This case suggests that rechallenge with palbociclib after severe liver injury with abemaciclib may allow for continued treatment with CDK4/6 inhibitors.

Changes in cell-free DNA after short-term palbociclib and fulvestrant treatment for advanced or metastatic hormone receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor 2-negative breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Here, we investigated the potential predictive and elucidating efficacy of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) changes on clinical outcomes and biological effects, respectively, after short-term palbociclib and fulvestrant treatment for patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive and human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2)-negative advanced or metastatic breast cancer (ABC). METHODS: In this secondary analysis of the Japan Breast Cancer Research Group-M07 (FUTURE) trial, blood cfDNA was obtained before palbociclib treatment and on day 15 of cycle one (28-day cycle). Target enrichment was performed using next-generation sequencing; progression-free survival (PFS) was compared based on cfDNA changes between baseline and day 15 of cycle one after combination therapy. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients (112 paired blood samples) were examined. The median follow-up time was 8.9 months. PIK3CA (30.4%, 17/56), FOXA1 (30.4%, 17/56), and ESR1 (28.6%, 16/56) were most frequently mutated at baseline. The number of mutated genes was significantly decreased on day 15 compared with that at baseline (paired t test: P value = 0.025). No significant difference was observed in PFS (decrease group, 7.9 m vs the others, 9.3 m; log-rank P value = 0.75; hazard ratio, 1.13; 95% confidence interval, 0.53-2.41). Among patients without previous aromatase inhibitor treatment (n = 15), three (20%) had ESR1 mutations after progression to fulvestrant. CONCLUSION: No significant association was observed between changes in mutated genes after short-term palbociclib and fulvestrant treatment and disease progression; a significant reduction in cfDNA mutation level was observed on day 15 of cycle one. Clinical meanings of cfDNA should be investigated in the future trials.

Overall Survival and Exploratory Biomarker Analyses of Abemaciclib plus Trastuzumab with or without Fulvestrant versus Trastuzumab plus Chemotherapy in HR+, HER2+ Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients.

PURPOSE: The monarcHER trial has shown that abemaciclib, a cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitor, combined with fulvestrant and trastuzumab, improves progression-free survival (PFS) in hormone receptor-positive (HR+), HER2-positive (HER2+) advanced breast cancer (ABC) compared with standard-of-care (SOC) chemotherapy combined with trastuzumab. We report the final overall survival (OS) analysis, updated safety and efficacy data, and exploratory biomarker results from monarcHER. PATIENTS AND METHODS: monarcHER (NCT02675231), a randomized, multicenter, open-label, phase II trial, enrolled 237 patients across Arm A (abemaciclib, trastuzumab, fulvestrant), Arm B (abemaciclib, trastuzumab), and Arm C (SOC chemotherapy, trastuzumab). Following the statistical plan, OS and PFS were estimated in all arms. RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) was performed on archival tissue. RESULTS: Median OS was 31.1 months in Arm A, 29.2 months in Arm B, and 20.7 months in Arm C [A vs. C: HR, 0.71; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.48-1.05; nominal two-sided P value 0.086; B vs. C: HR 0.83 (95% CI, 0.57-1.23); nominal two-sided P value 0.365]. Updated PFS and safety findings were consistent with previous results. The most frequently reported treatment-emergent adverse events included diarrhea, fatigue, nausea, neutrophil count decrease, and anemia. In exploratory RNA-seq analyses, Luminal subtypes were associated with longer PFS [8.6 vs. 5.4 months (HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.38-0.79)] and OS [31.7 vs. 19.7 months (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.46-1.00)] compared with non-Luminal. CONCLUSIONS: In this phase II trial, abemaciclib + trastuzumab ± fulvestrant numerically improved median OS in women with HR+, HER2+ ABC compared with SOC chemotherapy + trastuzumab.

A novel scaffold long-acting selective estrogen receptor antagonist and degrader with superior preclinical profile against ER+ breast cancer.

Breast cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors in women worldwide, with the majority of cases showing expression of estrogen receptors (ERs). Although drugs targeting ER have significantly improved survival rates in ER-positive patients, drug resistance remains an unmet clinical need. Fulvestrant, which overcomes selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) and AI (aromatase inhibitor) resistance, is currently the only long-acting selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD) approved for both first and second-line settings. However, it fails to achieve satisfactory efficacy due to its poor solubility. Therefore, we designed and synthesized a series of novel scaffold (THC) derivatives, identifying their activities as ER antagonists and degraders. G-5b, the optimal compound, exhibited binding, antagonistic, degradation or anti-proliferative activities comparable to fulvestrant in ER+ wild type and mutants breast cancer cells. Notably, G-5b showed considerably improved stability and solubility. Research into the underlying mechanism indicated that G-5b engaged the proteasome pathway to degrade ER, subsequently inhibiting the ER signaling pathway and leading to the induction of apoptosis and cell cycle arrest events. Furthermore, G-5b displayed superior in vivo pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics properties, coupled with a favorable safety profile in the MCF-7 tamoxifen-resistant (MCF-7/TR) tumor xenograft model. Collectively, G-5b has emerged as a highly promising lead compound, offering potent antagonistic and degradation activities, positioning it as a novel long-acting SERD worthy of further refinement and optimization.